Tag: accessibility

This is the article version of a talk I gave at work to our disability business resource group.

Hi, I’m Rachele DiTullio, a senior accessibility engineer. My day-to-day work is making sure digital information and digital systems work for people with disabilities. I’m talking to you today as a disabled co-worker. I figured out as an adult that I’m autistic. I was also diagnosed with ADHD. Learning this information about myself suddenly explained so much of the friction in my life. I got involved with the disability community and started understanding what it means to be neurodivergent.

I borrowed the title of this talk from the book Disability Visibility, a collection of essays by disabled authors, edited by disability activist Alice Wong. I wanted to use this title not only to highlight this great collection as an introduction into the diverse lives of disabled people, but because it reflects what the disability community wants you to understand about disabled people.

When I was asked to do this talk, I went to the disability community on Twitter to find out what disabled people want folks to know about disability. I’ve included selected tweets in this talk in order to share what other disabled people are saying, not just me. Two things came up over and over. Not all disabilities are visible; and many people have multiple disabilities.

When we talk about disability visibility, we’re acknowledging that many hidden disabilities, like chronic pain and cognitive conditions, need awareness and accommodation too. But even those with visible disabilities have largely been made invisible from our society due to a variety of access barriers that serve to keep disability hidden, even when an estimated one in four people in the United States experiences disability.

This quote from Alice’s book stood out to me:

Taking up space as a disabled person is always revolutionary.

Sandy Ho, “Canfei to Canji: The Freedom of Being Loud”

Many of us spend so much time masking or gritting our way through pain just to survive that being seen and having our needs met feels radical when it should be expected.

Let’s take a look at a tweet. Amy (@click2carney) says:

Disability is not a dirty word

In Ettie Bailey-King’s article “Disability is not a dirty word“, she reminds us that it’s okay to say the word “disability” because disabled peoples’ lives aren’t tragedies. There’s nothing to sugar-coat with euphemisms like “special needs.”

There are two main ways of talking about disability: person-first language and identity-first language.

Person-first language looks like this:

• I’m a person with disabilities.
• Rachele, a person with ADHD.
• They have autism.

Identity-first language looks like this:

• I’m disabled.
• Rachele’s autistic.
• They’re neurodivergent.

I prefer identity-first language but others may prefer person-first language. It’s best to ask people how they identify.

Let’s look at a tweet from Ellen (@ellenspertus):

Disability is a part of the human experience.

Let’s talk about ways of defining disability. There are many models of disability but two in particular are used frequently. Again from Bailey-King, the first is the medical model of disability, which says:

• People are disabled by cognitive, physical or motor differences or impairments.
• The “problem” is in their body.
• People can be mildly or severely disabled, depending on how far their body is from a “normal” body.

The second is the social model of disability, which says:

• People are disabled by structures. A wheelchair user is disabled by design choices, like buildings without ramps.
• The problem is social systems, not people’s bodies.
• Disability is a mismatch between a person and the environment they’re in.

Let’s look at a tweet from Adam (@adamfare1996):

Attitudes towards disabled people

Scope, a disability rights organization out of the UK, conducted a survey of attitudes towards disabled people with over 4000 disabled people and discovered that they experience a lot of negative attitudes and behaviors in their daily lives.

One third of disabled people (36%) stated that they have often experienced negative attitudes and behaviors in the last 12 months. (This increases to one in two disabled people (50%) under the age of 55.)

44% of disabled people said they feel less equal to others because of the attitudes and behaviors they experience.

42% experienced negative attitudes from work management; 41% from coworkers.

35% said they avoided [work] completely because of their negative experiences.

What we’re often working against is ableism.

Ableism is a set of beliefs or practices that devalue and discriminate against people with physical, intellectual, or psychiatric disabilities and often rests on the assumption that disabled people need to be ‘fixed’ in one form or the other. Ableism is intertwined in our culture, due to many limiting beliefs about what disability does or does not mean, how able-bodied people learn to treat people with disabilities and how we are often not included at the table for key decisions.

Leah Smith, Center for Disability Rights

Let’s look at a tweet from Gregory Mansfield (@GHMansfield):

Ableism is endemic in our society and must be actively dismantled like other forms of implicit bias.

Types of disabilities

Disabilities are generally sorted into five broad categories:

• Vision
• Hearing
• Mobility
• Cognitive
• Speech

Disability is a spectrum and may be permanent, temporary or situational:

Disability is the largest minority group there is and it’s the only one that we can enter at any time.

Disability is intersectional

Disability is not a monolith and there is no singular disabled experience. Some areas of intersectionality with disability include:

• Race
• Gender identity
• Sexual orientation
• Size
• Socioeconomic status

The experiences of a Black disabled person will vary from those of a trans disabled person or a poor disabled person in meaningful ways. Disability also intersects with every aspect of someone’s life:

• Employment
• School
• Family
• Community
• Mass incarceration

2016 data show that disabled people are overrepresented in the prison population making up approximately two-thirds of those incarcerated.

Talking about disability

We talked about the differences between person-first and identity-first language but let’s talk about some preferred terms for different types of disabilities.

• Vision: Blind or low vision
• Hearing: D/deaf, hard of hearing (HoH)
• Mobility: Limited mobility (wheelchair user, keyboard user, etc.)
• Cognitive: Neurodiversity, neurodivergent (Autism, dyslexia, Tourette syndrome, etc.)
• Speech: Non-speaking

It’s also important to know what terms to avoid. This is not an exhaustive list. For more information, consult the National Center on Disability and Journalism style guide.

• Handicapped. You still see this word used in signage, but the preferred term is to simply refer to things as being accessible.
• Using “the”, e.g. “the blind” or “the deaf”. This is very othering language that serves to exclude people.
• Crippled. This word should not be used anymore but it has been reclaimed by the disability community. You may hear disabled people refer to each other as “crips”, but you should not use this in-group term if you are not disabled.
• Special needs. Disabled needs are human needs. Calling them special makes it easier to ignore them.
• Differently-abled. As discussed, terms like this are unhelpful euphemisms. The preferred terms are disability and disabled.
• Able-bodied. This term should generally be avoided. The preferred terms are non-disable or enabled. The disability community sometimes refers to non-disabled people as “ableds”.
• Crazy/insane. These terms are pejorative towards people with mental illness and should not be used as insults.
• Idiot/moron. These terms are pejorative towards people with intellectual and developmental disabilities and should not be used as insults.
• Wheelchair-bound. No one is wheelchair-bound. People who use wheelchairs don’t spend all of their time in wheelchairs so this term is simply incorrect.
• Spastic/spaz. This is a specific medical term for some motor conditions and should not be used as an insult.
• Asperger’s or “high/low functioning Autism”. Asperger’s has not been in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) for more than 10 years and the term has roots in eugenics. It’s better to talk about Autism in term of the support needs of each person. Most people who are autistic are adults and we generally prefer the terms “autistic” or “autist”.

Let’s look at a tweet from Amelia (@ameliarchaeo), a Deaf archeologist:

Microaggressions

Microaggressions are comments or actions that subtly and often unconsciously or unintentionally express a prejudiced attitude toward a member of a marginalized group, like disabled people. Let’s look at some examples.

• Petting a person’s guide dog. Guide dogs are working and should not be touched without their owner’s permission.
• “I’ll pray for you.” Many disabled people find this infantilizing because it implies that the person is disabled because they haven’t satisfied some religious requirement.
• “I could never do what you do. You’re so inspiring!” Disabled people are not there as inspiration for non-disabled people. We are just going about our lives, trying to survive.
• Pity. Disabled people do not want or need pity or sympathy. Most of us do not view our disabilities in such a negative light.
• Talking to the interpreter not the Deaf person. It’s just rude not to speak to the person you’re having the conversation with.
• Getting angry when offers for help are refused. Many disabled people don’t want or don’t need help from others and when they do, they’ll ask. Don’t be offended if a disabled person refuses an offer of help.

Let’s look at a tweet from Jennifer (@jenpeggs):

Accessibility

Accessibility is the extent to which a product, service, physical location or digital asset works for disabled people. Accessibility is the way we benchmark how well our solutions work to break down barriers.

Let’s look at a tweet from Justin (@FatElvis04), a blind accessibility consultant:

Accessibility is a human right.

To aid accessibility efforts, we can incorporate inclusive design. Inclusive design principals seek to create solutions that are usable by a wide range of people. There’s a saying in the disability community: Nothing about us without us. This means that our design process must include disabled people. We need to hire disabled people to create and build solutions. We need to pay disabled people for their feedback on how our solutions can work better for them.

July is Disability Pride month

Each year on July 26, we celebrate Disability Independence Day which marks the day the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) was signed into law in 1990. This year marks the 33rd anniversary of the signing. Let’s not forget what led to Congress passing this bill.

In March of 1990, over 1000 members of the disability rights group ADAPT met at the US Capitol to speak with members of Congress about ADA legislation. But the Capitol was inaccessible to many of the activists. There were 83 stone steps separating them from Congress. Many disabled people left their canes, crutches and wheelchairs to physically pull themselves up those steps to demonstrate the barriers they face every day.

I want to leave you one of my favorite quotes about disability from Haben Girma, the first deafblind graduate of Harvard Law:

Disability is never a barrier. Design is.

Thank you.